This is in my own plans as well. We should work together. Travis Bemann <bemann at bemann.sourceforge.net> writes:
> I'm going to write another Freenet node implementation. This > implementation is going to be in plain ANSI C, not C++. It will use > an encrypted datastore which is designed to be quite scalable. The > datastore will not be a flat directory full of files whose names are > the hashed keys for those files, but rather a tree of directories. > I've figured out the semantics for this, but I don't have time to > explain them right now. Anyways, the name of this freenet node is > going to be nfreenetd (the n differentiates it from Whiterose, which > might use the name freenetd) and it is targeted at Unix/Linux > systems. It will be designed with mainly security, stability, and > scalability in mind, and speed will mainly be a side effect from it > being written in C rather than Java or C++. Yes, I am going to make > sure to check array bounds when I have to use fixed arrays, and I am > going to avoid fixed arrays like the plague. This practice will stop > crashes from overrunning arrays and buffer overflow exploits (which > are particulary nasty as exploits go). Note that I haven't written > this yet. > > -- > Travis Bemann > Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. > My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
