Brandon schrieb: > > > I had a mad idea (feel free to point and laugh...) > > I think this is a great idea, or at least some variant thereof. > what about the couple of people like me that can't affort permanent connection to freenet? it makes not much sense for the to store datas, because they are disconnected from the network most time. allthough, they should be judged by their routing. > [oh well, what ever, nevermind] > > But we certainly could use some way to rank the usefulness of different > nodes/parts of the network and communicate more with those that are more > useful. The only way we're going to get Freenet to be ubiquitous is to > add some incentive (i.e. better service from the network) for running a > useful node. you already have some: 1) you have a lot of documents stored locally (fast acess for you) 2) you can log all requests -- and see what topics are popular... that maybe interesting for some people we may add, that nodes first (_not_ only) serve nodes which are often giving dataRequests.
_______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
