> > That's what I mean - we shouldn't break the compile. We shouldn't > > change compatability without inviting comments from this mailing list > > first, and warning people on the mailing list. > > People who want to test / play should use the stable release. If we are to not > be able to change the protocol of Freenet this early in the development then > we > are not going to get anywhere.
Of course - where did I say we could never change the protocol or break backward compatability? I simply don't want any "lone-gunmen" changing things and breaking compatability with clients, without consulting other developers first. > Encryption has been discussed here, and there is no way to get it in without > breaking the protocol. I though everyone was in the clear about this. My comments were not directed at the encryption work you guys have been doing - if it is impossible to implement encryption without breaking compatability, then break compatability we must! Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
