> EndMessage is far better than DataLength=0 - please lets stick with it.
> DataLength=0 simply means there isn't a trailing field - does having a 
> DataLength=123 mean the same thing? This is just plain ugly, meaning that
> (for no reason) DataLength has to be the last header. Keep the EndMessage.

EndMessage sounds simpler, but in reality, using datalength=0 is a more
elegant solution.  Doing so means the node receives that message, reads n
bytes, where n might be 0, and then knows that message is complete.  It
has 1 exit point.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to