Congrats! I believe we mostly agreed that it didn't so much matter which cipher is chosen for 0.x since it will be replaced by AES anyway. Just as long as the production version of Freenet only supports one cipher.
If the cipher used now happens to be selected as the AES, no additional work would be needed. Twofish is at least in the running for AES. Blowfish is not. (Though my money is on Rijndael winning AES. It appears to be the best choice, perhaps with a few more rounds added). Twofish sounds good. --Lucky On Mon, 8 May 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Oskar checked in his transport abstraction code tonight. After which it > was a 10 minute job to link up the encryption code. We now have > link->link encryption! Granted, its XOR encryption, but this is a matter > of implementing a block cipher and changing one line of code. > > Which cipher did we pick? Blowfish or Twofish? > > Parrrrtay! > > Scott > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE5F19fpXyM95IyRhURApySAJ48WdPvu+/utxp6s2U+cJu64p3k0QCfT5Rp > a4nhpNcIPdW4KcwG/wQqpj8= > =T0d4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev > -- Lucky Green <shamrock at cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
