Any form of typing is fine with me. The question is whether it should
be value or field typing, though I would be inclined to make it easy
and stick to value typing (declaring fields might be a little over
complicated).


> In that case, maybe it would be better just to take another byte for a type
> indicator.  For example, S = string, N = number, B = boolean.  Then we
> wouldn't have to perform escaping and it would be more flexible if we
> eventually wanted to add new types.  e.g.
> 
> Field1=Ssomestring
> Field2=N3a372f83
> Field3=Btrue
> 
> theo
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
> 


_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to