Brandon <blanu at uts.cc.utexas.edu> wrote: > As far as putting it in the distribution, I don't think this is the kind > of thing that should go in the distribution. I don't know how anyone else > feels about it, though. I think it would be good to have a core Freenet > package and then a Freenet application package, like they do with > gnome-core and gnome-apps. The first package would have everything you > need to run a node. The second would have all of the nifty applications > that run on top of Freenet. But anyway, that's just an idea I had.
I think this is a good idea, actually - since we are starting to build up a largish set of contrib addons (various Java and Perl clients, and now C and Python things), we ought to make them available in prebuilt form. It makes more sense, actually, to make the friendlier clients available to those who download binaries, rather than just those who download source. theo _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
