-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > > I'm not Lee :) I was just pointing out that your argument swayed me right back away from Lee's camp. :)
> > If you send a freenet message over email, you are 'encapsulating' the > freenet message in another transport protocol, not translating. This is > often referred to as tunneling. A gateway would try to change a Freenet > message into SMTP, which wouldn't be very usefull. Actually, Freenet over SMTP might very well be useful, for people behind firewalls that only allow email traffic. > Nothing wrong with building a distributed Java app, but I think the project > will go faster and further if a decision is made on which approach to take, > it would keep people from working at cross purposes. I think all of us agree with this. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5HDDapXyM95IyRhURAkweAKDGm9WyQzAjQ2QpcRdI+6mgsCMDGgCff2wa KEzXZwezGCFgObwfgbNu8HE= =v2Pn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
