On Sat, 13 May 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> > I have a question for somebody: If how the node communicates is the
> > protocol,
> > and if the format of the messages is the transport, then what should the
> > underlying protocol used ("tcp", but could be anything) to it be called?
> Thats probably my bad. How the node communicates is the protocol, the
> format of the messages is just a serialization, format, or payload (I'm
> sure there are other, better terms). The underlying protocol, the thing
> that phsycially moves bytes, is the transport.
Ah, but the key exchange and encryption are pretty clearly not part of the
serialization. I think it looks like we need to invent a word.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE5HYtzpXyM95IyRhURAkmEAJ4hFxExXaKNSHWRlKgxG9nDH4F8qACfY1Sa
> 9ihO4ngrUaZhoUrgF2Ei2qU=
> =AWqX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
--
___
Oskar Sandberg
md98-osa at nada.kth.se
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
