> > Gee, isn't it great how much sematic content can be encoded in > > strings? :-) > Yeah, but can you imagine having to write the code to parse that... in the > application you wanted to use it? Oh wait, I have... it was a pain in the > ass. Thats why I did it once, at the presentation layer.
You can also do it once in a utility class. It doesn't have to be a layer as such, you can just write some functions to decode strings into types and then put them in a library. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
