On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > Yes, I'm going to work on the client classes so that they process trailing > > > field metadata so that the www interfaces can add ContentType trivially. > > > > That is good. The client classes need work, unfortunately I have been > > afraid to > > change them now that we have Freeloader et al depending on them. > > Yes, I somewhat dread getting around to rewriting the clients, but it > needs to be done. I think I can keep the amount of broken stuff down to > acceptable levels, though, as what mainly needs to be done is breaking > things up into more functions. I think maybe a new method of handling > messages might be in order, though. Right now it's a big case statement > and I don't really like those. I think a message handling system like the > node uses would be good, replacing the node's message handler classes with > new ones for the client.
This shouldn't be an incredibly large problem for some clients, such as Liberator or freenetlib. But then, I don't really know much about the internals of the Java Freenet client. -- Travis Bemann -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1284 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000523/6ecea890/attachment.pgp>
