On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:12:41PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > I have been working on the FCPHandler servlet to bring it in line with the > latest revisions to the FCP spec, and I've found a couple holes. We need > to provide a SizeError response to a ClientPut in case the size of the > data exceeds what is allowed for that key type (e.g. the 32k limit on > non-CHKs).
Yep, SizeError is a good call. Done. > Also, we need to allow a CipherName field in ClientPut which > should probably default to Twofish.. (right now the FCPHandler is > defaulting to Rijndael -- ??). Hmm, really? Should we? FNP has always been pretty conservative in it's ciphers used and that helps stop cipher-creep (see the bloated shit that is SSL). Scott, do we really want this? AGL -- This statement is false! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010403/1e298663/attachment.pgp>
