On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:01:15PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:
> Michael Carmack <karmak at w3.org> writes:
> 
> > Whereas a jump to 0.3.8.2 "feels" less significant than a jump to
> > 0.3.9 and one could argue for choosing to version this way, I'm not
> > sure it's really that useful developers or users. A more logical
> > versioning scheme might use major/minor/subminor numbers, where the
> > major number gets incremented when backwards compatibility is
> > broken, the minor number gets incremented when new features are
> > added (forward compatibility is broken), and the subminor number
> > gets incremented when neither forwards nor backwards compatibility
> > is broken (e.g. bugfixes, added documentation, etc).
> 
> In fact, that is the scheme we're using.  But everyone here is too
> gutless to release a 1.0, so it's 0.major.minor.micro.

Hmm... would that make 0 a supermajor number? :) And if so, what is
it's logical significance?

m.


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

>From devl-admin at freenetproject.org  Sat Apr  7 16:33:57 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06164
        for <danello at danky.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:33:55 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 8505858044; Sat,  7 Apr 2001 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: from tux.w3.org (tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F9557D9C
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sat,  7 Apr 2001 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from karmak at localhost)
        by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA13645
        for devl at freenetproject.org; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:09:14 -0400
From: Michael Carmack <[email protected]>
To: devl at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number
Message-ID: <20010407160914.D20409 at tux.w3.org>
References: <20010407190101.E557F58062 at hawk.freenetproject.org> 
<20010407153305.B20409 at tux.w3.org> <87lmpceayc.fsf at 
azrael.dyn.cheapnet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Reply via email to