On Friday 06 April 2001 18:40, you wrote: > So I checked in the changes that were discussed. > Testing is appreciated. > > If anyone has any brilliant ideas about a Freenet.client.Handler > architecture, feel free.. as dicussed the Request and hypothetical > Handler classes should not need to know anything about which > ClientFactory backend is being used. > > cheers
Was this ok'd by Oskar? -- gj -- Web page inside Freenet: freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Sat Apr 7 18:57:50 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA06743 for <danello at danky.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 18:57:49 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36FA58084; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 15:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
