> If we really want to protect node operators (which is not, by the way, > a goal of the Freenet Project),
Whoa there, mister (bad), it's one of *my* goals. We are doing Silent Bob in 0.4, at least. Sure, I'd love more steganography but there's only so much time in the day. If there are some steganographers about then I'll certainly support their efforts. When all of this key index metadata searching hoo-dad is over, I'll try to get to steganography. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Tue Apr 10 04:48:00 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23092 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 04:47:59 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A85B5813E; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from server5.generalmail.com (server5.fpw.ch [194.209.117.20]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FB158135 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([194.209.117.3]) by server5.generalmail.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-58584U1100L100S0V35) with ESMTP id com for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:46:28 +0200 Received: from tavin by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14mtRG-0000Sx-00 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 04:23:50 -0400 From: Tavin Cole <[email protected]> To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Risks of large key indexes Message-ID: <20010410042350.A1784 at niss> References: <20010409231500.A4406 at ultraviolet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010409231500.A4406 at ultraviolet.org>; from treed at ultraviolet.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:15:00PM -0700 Sender: devl-admin at freenetproject.org Errors-To: devl-admin at freenetproject.org X-BeenThere: devl at freenetproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org List-Help: <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:devl at freenetproject.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Discussion of information related to Freenet development <devl.freenetproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 04:23:50 -0400 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Status: RO Content-Length: 1124 Lines: 28 On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:15:00PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote: > What is to stop them from confiscating his node, applying the decryption > keys from the list of nekkid eskimo pics (or lists of any and all illegal > information in indexes on freenet for that matter) to the files in the > nodes cache, and hitting upon some files which happen to decrypt into > something they can nail him with posessing? Well, hopefully it's some consolation that in 0.4, all you have to do is wipe* the directory file for the datastore and this will be virtually impossible. The datastore will be one huge encrypted file and the encryption key will be in the directory file. (* wipe == delete + overwrite those blocks with random data multiple times, e.g. the 'wipe' program for unix -- for those who don't know) -- # tavin cole # # "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder." # - Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Tue Apr 10 04:51:00 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23109 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 04:50:59 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC6958155; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from moe.cc.utexas.edu (moe.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.2]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27B658135 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (blanu at localhost) by moe.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/cc-uts-client-1.11) with ESMTP id DAA20541 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 03:27:40 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: moe.cc.utexas.edu: blanu owned process doing -bs From: Brandon <[email protected]> X-Sender: blanu at moe.cc.utexas.edu To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Risks of large key indexes In-Reply-To: <20010409231500.A4406 at ultraviolet.org>
