David is right. No jview. It's crap. It doesn't work. Providing an installer bundled w/ Sun's JRE is totally sensible. Then we provide a "Lite" installer and say, "only use this if you have Sun or IBM java, or you know what you're doing"
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:13:49PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > From: "Ian Clarke" <ian at hawk.freenetproject.org> > > >This isn't true, most Windows users have IE which comes with jview, a > >java interpreter which Freenet seems to work with. > >Ian. > > Some of the time. > > Ian, Sebastian and others, **please note**: > > I'm running Internet Explorer 5.0, with installations of Windows 2000 > Professional and Windows 98 Second Edition. > Freenet 0.3.7.2 and 0.3.8.1 failed to work on either of these installations > when using the Windows/IE built-in Java. > But both these Freenet versions worked on both installations when using > Sun's JRE. > > I have verified this (conclusively for Win98) by using a clean-install
