> This is pseudo-lawyering, which is dangerous. As has been demonstrated > with Napster (who didn't filter anything), whether you currently filter > something or not, if it is on the WWW, you can be shut down.
This is U.S. legal precedent. Napster was shut down because it was deemed a technology specifically designed for copyright infringement without substantial non-infringing uses. Search engines, on the other hand, have historically been okay unless they censored some content, in which they were deemed to be taking responsibility for the non-filtered content. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Wed Apr 18 08:18:05 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA14939 for <danello at danky.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:52:43 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
