Stefan Wrote: >From: "Sam Joseph" <gaijin at yha.att.ne.jp> > > I'm not clear about how Freegle works out which keywords to associate > > with the keys (looked in the FAQ and about Freegle, but no joy), but the > >scheme I describe above is implemented in aggregate by DirectHit.com and > > in a personalized manner by NeuroGrid.com (my own offering). The > > NeuroGrid keyword-file association tracking mechanism is already being > > implemented in a couple of other P2P systems.
> Currently Freegle matches search keywords with the key itself. In case of > HTML pages, the title is also stored and displayed. Making it searchable too > is not very difficult. The same can (and will) be done for meta > keywords/description and even the content of the page itself. When you say that Freegle matches search keywords with the key itself, you mean that only words that appear in the key are used? So if I search for "Douglas" then only those keys that contain the string "Douglas" will be returned, plus those HTML pages that have titles specified? > Of course, this doesn't prevent malicious publishers from using > inappropriate keywords - as it happens on the WWW all the time. Sure > Using feedback for rating is close to impossible with a Freenet search > engine the way it is currently organized. The web variant could track clicks > on search results via a simple redirect script. But the in-Freenet variant > can't track anything. Really? Isn't the key index used by Freenet search engines also saved into Freenet? What does that file consist of? Just the keys
