>>>>> "B" == Bad  <mr.bad at pigdog.org> writes:

    B> Could you actually just send the relevant logfile excerpt?

Also, is it the -same- keys, every time? Or just a-b-c-d-a-b-c-d, with
different values a, b, c and d for each search? And is there anything
funky about the stored data items (the ref-less, doc-lessness was the
big breakthrough last time)?

~Mr. Bad

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ 
 freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
 "Statements like this give the impression that this article was
  written by a madman in a drug induced rage"  -- Ben Franklin
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Tue Apr 24 09:42:56 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA03033
        for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:18:55 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id C732E580ED; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: from rm03-24-131-185-22.ce.mediaone.net 
(rm03-24-131-185-22.ce.mediaone.net [24.131.185.22])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F7B580CE
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by rm03-24-131-185-22.ce.mediaone.net (8.11.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id 
f3O4wxO02566
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:58:59 -0400
From: "Mark J. Roberts" <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:  <mjr at rm03-24-131-185-22.ce.mediaone.net>
To: <devl at freenetproject.org>
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [freenet-tech] Java's using my whole processor

Reply via email to