On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:22:56PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > No, it really wouldn't. The "perceived performance surfing Freenet > > websites" is caused by the latency traversing the network to > > search for the data. Compression of the data wouldn't help with that at > > all. > > BTW, I figured out how to eliminate this problem. The solution is to have > a pre-fetching caching web proxy between your browser and FProxy. That way > whenever you go to a site all of the links will be already cached in your > node. This will also help with site propagation because sites will > propagate altogether rather than having the index page receive a lot more > hits, resulting in often broken links. Yeah, thats a good solution. 0.4 is actually fixing the network in certain ways that *should* (might?) help significantly.
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010427/a179927a/attachment.pgp>
