On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:20:03PM -0500, Scott Young wrote:
> I am willing to work on this after I figure out the internals of Freenet
> (although the poor documentation is slowing me down). After I get the Binary
> Tree DBRs working well, I would then like to work on redundant block
> matching, although I shouldn't get too far ahead of myself. I still need to
> get over the hurdle of understanding the internals though.
If you can get an intelligent binary tree DBR scheme working, I think
that would be great. Your scheme sounds reasonable but I bet there will
be some unexpected difficulties, if prior experience indicates anything ;)
A desirable thing for a client to do is try to remember the results of
previous tree traversals so it can avoid making more than one request
whenever possible.
As for your redundant block matching, I don't think any of us really
understand exactly what you want to accomplish there or how it could
actually work without breaking other elements of Freenet's design.
--
:: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) ::
if there's been a way to build it
there'll be a way to destroy it
things are not all that out of control
- stereolab
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
