On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:16:12AM -0600, Will Glynn wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:49:11PM -0600, Will Glynn wrote:
> > > While inserting data over FCP, I came upon the following response:
> > >
> > > RouteNotFound: Reason=Request state lost due to overflow
> > >
> > > Can anyone explain this?
> >
> > Your node must have been very very busy (or you reduced the
> > messageStoreSize config setting). It means the internal state tables
> > were forced to drop your request because 500 other ones had been active
> > more recently than yours.
> >
> > How long did it take to receive that response?
>
> It failed a few times with that same error about 15 seconds apart. I
> didn't change messageStoreSize. One other thing to note is that this node
> is on a dual-P3 with a T-1 that it saturates on a regular basis, so busy
> could be expected -- should I just increase messageStoreSize?
You probably should. Perhaps we should increase the default value.
--
:: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) ::
if there's been a way to build it
there'll be a way to destroy it
things are not all that out of control
- stereolab
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
