> I see, so instead of implementing the relatively simple client protocol,
> people need to find an XML parser capable of parsing fragments, for
> whatever language they are using, or write their own.

No, you get an XML-RPC library for whatever language you're using. I can
give you a URL right now for perl, Python, C, C++, Java, or Python.

> What exactly is the advantage of implementing it the way you describe
> (in concrete terms please, give examples)?  I have pointed out the
> disadvantage (it would either require a very significant programming
> effort, or the availability of a library for the platform people are
> developing for).

I see it the opposite way. I consider implementing an FNCP library to be
something that would require significant programming effort or the
availability of a library for the platform they are developing for. Since
XML-RPC already exists in the majority of languages, even obscure ones
like Scheme and Dylan, you can just download the library.



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to