On 19 Feb 2001, Steven Hazel wrote: > Using a standard protocol is a good choice either way, because it > means that the freenet library will be easier to implement. Having > implemented a freenet library myself, I can say this with some amount > of certainty. Using an easy-to-implement protocol does *not* win over > using an already-implemented protocol, particularly if the > already-implemented protocol has advantages like interoperability with > existing tools and environments.
We actually agree more than one would think. If our new protocol isn't extremely simple, then we're better off with XML-RPC. The proposed client protocol is *not* extremely simple. -- Mark Roberts mjr at statesmean.com _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
