> I would encourage you not to statically link against your version of > glibc, as it could create problems for some users. glibc is a highly > system-defendant library. Unless you *know* that users aren't going > to have an adequate libc, avoid a static link to it. IMHO, it's > better to say "oh, and you'll need to upgrade your libc" than to hand > people a binary that includes a libc.
deb and rpm take care of this whole library version checking thing for you. How long until we have a GCJ-Fred that runs under Windows? That will eliminate like 50% of our support posts. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
