On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Adam Langley wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:35:29AM -0600, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Thank you, Master, may I have another? > > You can have the Metadata spec soon > > > It's probably best to leave transport details (like "...is > > unencrypted") out of protocol specs. FCP over an encrypted connection > > sounds like it might be a good idea at some point. > > Ok, encrypted FCP *might run encrypted*, but for the moment it's local and > uncrypted
I think that in the case of FCP, since we have no special requirements of the crypto, the right thing to do is use SSL. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
