>From "Nick Lee" <nlee64 at home.com> >What I have in mind is actually the same concept as FCP and XML-RPC clients. >The only difference is that I'm going to use standard web service facility, >ie. SOAP, WSDL. I don't think it makes sense to have so many client >protocols in Freenet, so here, I'm asking for people's opinions on moving to >SOAL/WSDL. (If opinions are positive, I'd be more than happy to do the >implementation. PCOS will need a Freenet client anyway.)
What benefit does SOAP have not provided by existing client interfaces to Freenet? >Don't get me wrong. I'm NOT totally against remote access. If there are >benefits offseting this seeming "unhealthiness", I'm all for it. I'm just >saying that is the reason why PCOS only does local service initially. Remote access to Freenet really isn't meaningful, you access Freenet remotely by running a node. There's really nothing special about a user's "home" node, vs. the one on their laptop, for example. -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
