> > Is it really that important to yet release another bugfix release > > without any 'real' Freenet code changes? There were discussions on > > making a new release because we have new stuff in Freenet, that is what > > I am waiting for. I know: release early, release often, but forcing all > > web page translators to change the links as we have another installer > > only related release in not my thing. > > Yeh, well, maybe. > Don't forget that numerous _significant_ changes have been made to > freenet.exe, not least the fact that all 'known' "I just installed Freenet > on Windows XXXXX and it doesn't work" bugs are now fixed. A cursory glance > at the Bugtracker or a flit through the support mailing list shows that this > is the NUMBER ONE concern with the Windows freenet. > How long are we going to leave an installer with a critical bug that forces > you to CTRL+ALT+DEL ? The longer we leave it, the more it alienates the > Windows users. It also dirties the Freenet name among the Windows > community. > > You know I'm right. > > And anyway, we don't need to change any links. Update the installer > executable. Keep it as 0.3.9.1-2 if you need to. > > Dave > > (apologies for the work-related email address. do NOT use it!) >
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
