On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:52:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:28:10PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > > Thanks for doing the legwork on this, Bad. However, I think requiring > > users to restart the node once a day to get new inform.php addresses, > > or requiring them to maintain the nodes.config file, isn't what we > > want in the long run. > > > > We need to modify the way the routing table works so that it doesn't > > lead to "ubernode election" in the first place. > > And, as I said in my original email, one promising avenue of > investigation is limiting the number of references to a given node in > the datastore. Assuming anything other than a tiny network, there is no > good reason why multiple references to the same node must be tolerated. > > Ian.
if you have to *force* the organization of the network by doing something like this, then the system is broken (Remember all that talk about self organization?) <cliche> Don't treat the symptom, and ignore the disease. If you do this, you will *never* know if the underlying cause has been addressed. </cliche> D Schutt _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
