On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:39:19PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote: > * What's the new deal with the 21st byte (is it dead due to delow)
I think we are killing it and relying on PartSize in the storables. > * Whats the spec for hashing Storable feilds in CHKs (and others?) This is what I'm going on atm: CHK routekey = hash(hash(storables) + hash(progressive_hash_firstblock(encrypt(doc)))) SVK signature = sign(hash(storables) + hash(progressive_hash_firstblock(encrypt(doc)))) All keys will be verified with progressive hash streams just like CHKs. -- # tavin cole # # "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder." # - Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sun May 6 15:05:36 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA27161 for <danello at danky.com>; Fri, 4 May 2001 09:03:00 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5480F58013; Fri, 4 May 2001 06:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from server5.generalmail.com (server5.fpw.ch [194.209.117.20]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60CD57D9E for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Fri, 4 May 2001 06:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([194.209.117.3]) by server5.generalmail.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5 release 215 ID# 0-58584U1100L100S0V35)
