I have also been thinking about how logging could be enhanced further. One idea I had was to have a "dump log" facility, where the last 10 messages of each debugging level are outputted, and could form part of a bug report. This would ease the requirement that someone needs to try to recreate a bug because the first time it happened they were using "Normal" logging.
Any thoughts? Ian. On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:37:55AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > In 0.4 there are a few enhancements to the logging (and a lot > more could no doubt be made, but these were very simple and a big > help to me so far in debugging 0.4): > > * Inclusion of thread names with verbosity > COMPLETE. > * Object hashcodes given in hex instead of decimal. > * New log() call that accepts an exception as the "cause" of the log() > call and prints a stack trace to the log if verbosity >= DETAILED. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010504/21107b86/attachment.pgp>
