On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:05:46PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > Read the list archives.
Don't you think I have anything better to do ;-) > Ok, I'll do anything for our favorite rock star.. oh dear, this is going to stick isn't it. > Yes, Ian, there's already a simple plug-in API in 0.4 that allows the > plug-ins to use an internal implementation of the Client API in exactly > the same way as someone using the Client library to do FCP or FNP. I know. There was much more to my comment than that. I am suggesting that FProxy, FCP, and XML-RPC are rewritten to work with that library, and probably that the command-line clients are rewritten to speak FCP (some people are doing this already). Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010506/4e47d8bb/attachment.pgp>
