On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 10:24:14AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:15:44PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> > > Appending the metadata key to the CHK strikes me as an inelegant
> > > solution to a non-problem.
> > 
> > It has already been generally agreed that there are two problems which
> > have to be solved. Only one solution to these two problems has been
> > suggested, which is taking metadata out of CHKs. So unless you have a more
> > elegant solution to the same two problems then its elegance is not a valid
> > issue.
> 
> I don't think that the possibility that two identical documents might
> have different CHKs due to differences in the metadata, is actually a
> serious problem.  The metadata is supposed to be a description of the

Reply via email to