On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 10:24:14AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:15:44PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > Appending the metadata key to the CHK strikes me as an inelegant > > > solution to a non-problem. > > > > It has already been generally agreed that there are two problems which > > have to be solved. Only one solution to these two problems has been > > suggested, which is taking metadata out of CHKs. So unless you have a more > > elegant solution to the same two problems then its elegance is not a valid > > issue. > > I don't think that the possibility that two identical documents might > have different CHKs due to differences in the metadata, is actually a > serious problem. The metadata is supposed to be a description of the
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Mr.Bad
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Tavin Cole
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Tavin Cole
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... [email protected]
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... toad
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... [email protected]
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Oskar Sandberg
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... [email protected]
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metada... [email protected]
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Brandon
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Adam Langley
