How come I never got the original of this? Was it sent to a different freenet mailing list than this one (it's the only one I'm subbed to unfortunately).
> you should announce these things to the web mailing list so that the > translators can do their thing. > > Ian. > I am still not 100% happy with the changes made Which changes are you not happy with? Spit it out and we'll fix them together! > A couple of things got broke while I didn't really pay attention to the > installer: > 1) Taking away the -cp freenet.jar from FLaunch.ini broke the system > tray utility as Dave Hoopers implementation reads that file, but didn't > set the classpath variable. It does set the classpath now, fixed! (that > was the could main class not found thingy) Well your implementation would've done the same thing! :-p Don't forget my implementation started out as a straight port of your code into C; > 2) Dave's implementation reads the entry "fserve" in FLaunch.ini which > starts the graphical Node invisibly and thus wastes RAM. The solution > will be to have an entry fserveCLI (or similar which is read instead). > This is feasible Ok, Makes sense. I'll have to have a play to see if I can still quit the non-GUI freenet node by sending it a WM_CLOSE message. I might check in an update tonight, or, I might just go to bed. > 3) Daves freenet.exe will signal an error on startup when using the CLI > node (Freenet.node.Node) while the graphical node (node.gui.GUINode) > works fine. *He* will have to fix this, as he added some complicated > stuff (multiple threads etc...) to my simple implementation, making it > impossible to me to understand it fully ;-). Dave are you listening? > Otherwise, I'll have to downgrade your tool to a level I can handle :-) Meow! I'll talk you through the code sometime if you like, but essentially
