On Thu, 17 May 2001, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:26:27PM +0200, Sebastian Sp?th wrote: > > I recall that FProxy has been changed to take the required port number > > directly from freenet.ini/.reenetrc now. What about > > freenet_insert/freenet_request? Do these still need the port number > > appended to the command line or do they take the default port number as > > well fromm freenet.ini/.freenetrc??? > > The correct way to achieve this is to rewrite the CLI clients to use > FCP, that way the FNP port is irrelevant. > > I can't quite decide whether cross-platform Java CLI clients would be > preferable to platform specific clients, perhaps providing a few options > would be best.... > > Ian.
for what it's worth, I've completed a perl client + Library that talks FCP level 1. I'm also finishing a proxy that takes level 2 (any level 1 FCP is automatically level 2, as far as I'm concerned) and does all the hard work of dealing with splitfiles and redirects. Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com If you love something, set it free. GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010517/0dc7fc78/attachment.pgp>
