At 15.39 09/11/01 +0000, you wrote: > > BTW wich is the position of Freenet Project Inc > > on releasing Freenet under GPL ? > >Freenet is under the GPL, allways has been.enet
I am happy to have this confirmation; I obviously already found the license in the sources. There are some things to correct to have a perfect use of GPL, first of all the inclusion of the license in ALL distributions of ALL parts of Freenet, but, considering the present state of the developement, I think that is a minor problem. But I were unable to understand the document that Freenet Project Inc. ask all developers to sign, to take over the code. It seems to me a double etched doc, and I were unable to understand his purposes. Can you explain me the situation from this point of view ? Manu thanks. Marco "Quando uso una parola - disse Humpty Dumpty con tono abbastanza sprezzante - essa significa proprio cio' che io scelgo di dire, ne' piu' ne' meno." "Il problema e' - disse Alice - se puoi dare alle parole significati tanto differenti." "Il problema e' - disse Humpty Dumpty - chi e' il padrone. E' tutto qui." * Mac (Marco A. Calamari) marcoc at dada.it www.marcoc.it * * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * * DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B * * PGP keys: request keyserver http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 * _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
