On Friday 09 November 2001 10:25 am, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > "Dave Hooper" <dave at beermex.com> writes: > > From: "Robert Bihlmeyer" <robbe at orcus.priv.at> > > > > > Qt Free is only for X ... not MS Windows. > ^^^^^^^ > > > Wrong [...] > > > > Quote: > > The Qt Non Commercial Edition for Microsoft Windows > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Spot the difference? > > Interestingly, > > <URL:http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/general.html#Q8> says: > | Qt for Microsoft Windows is only available as Professional and > | Enterprise Editions. > > Seems Trolltech are themselves confused.
Yeah the trolls are confused it seems. I think when the dust settles, you can link your program against the Qt/Win non-commercial version with a special exception from the copyright holder blah blah. > > Qt would therefore be an ideal development platform for a freenet > > client. > > Not IMHO. See below. > > Qt/X11 is dual licensed under QPL and GNU GPL. But Qt/Windows is > gratis for non-commercial use only. Qt/Mac is (currently) available > as a binary only evaluation verison. I don't know what the licensing > plans are for that platform. > > If I write free software, I base it on something that is free > everywhere and for everyone. Just my EUR 0.02. > > (It's getting off-topic, that's my last comment on the Qt issue.) My primary goal in writing a Freenet publisher is to make it accessable to anyone and everyone regardless of what platform they're running. It's strictly a free speech point of view, not anything more. -- Jay Oliveri "In the land of the blind, GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 the one-eyed man is king." _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
