> It looks like the current CP decay scheme is too harsh. Nodes that don't > answer most connection requests are quickly lost as their CP falls. The > problem is that most nodes don't answer most requests because of the amount > of traffic on the network. The only nodes that survive are a few "ubernodes" > which must have really good connectivity / CPU power.
I agree, take a look at the attatched html file, some good nodes are ignored way to quickly. But there are a lot of failed connects, it cant all be bad network conditions.. -- | Are ?rseth | elrond at idi.ntnu.no | http://ctemp.dhs.org/ | | tlf: 73886876 | mob: 410 00548 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011114/88280e77/attachment.htm>
