From: "thelema" <[email protected]>
> not bad. If there's any annoying protocol issues, I'm the person to > bother with them, especially in regards to the metadata spec. Could you possibly add a statement to the effect of 'every fieldset can have additional optional 'key=value' pairs and that all fcp parsers are expected to be able to handle them as such and still work flawlessly if only what is specced is sent? It would make sure that anyone creating such a fcp parser would not get caught up on the spec being outdated. (on an aside, i think the failed count really should be documented someplace so the clients can keep track of it but sometime adam *will* finish wr which probably won't include the same extra metadata so we have to watch out for it) > Thelema > -- > E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com If you love something, set it free. > GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D -Mathew _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
