On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:11:27PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: > Anyway, it wouldn't execute net.exe, it would go directly through the SCM, > but the end result would be the same. If implemented properly, the systray > app could send configuration requests directly to the service, rather than > simply relying on the service to pick up changes when it is > stopped-and-restarted. At its most basic this would simply mean having a > custom handler defined to mean 'restart the node', which would in fact be > implemented within the service to shutdown and restart the java node.
Yes, but remember that we must still support versions of windows which do not support services. > You're right about FCP. I don't know much about FCP and the systray app > predates it, maybe that's reason enough for me to look at using FCP to shut > the node down. FCP doesn't currently have a "shutdown" command, but it is high-time one was implemented (using the password that can be specified in the config file). Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011024/2f490956/attachment.pgp>
