Hi, It occurred to me that there might be some benefit to inserting freesites as a single redundant splitfile containing an archive of the site. (Or two archives - one for the static portion and one for today's insert).
This could make both retreiving freesites more reliable due to the splitfile redunancy and inserting freesites would work or fail atomically rather than leaving a site half inserted on insert failure. Support for this would be fairly easy to add to fproxy - just a matter of inventing a URI syntax for it I guess and having fproxy break files out of the archive when requested. degs _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
