guardian at ntplx.net writes: <SNIP corruption talk> > > I do agree with Oskar, that transient nodes have trouble getting > data. Should we be ignoring those forced to work behind a non-editable > firewall config? If freenet truly fails completely behind a NAT > firewall, I think it needs to be fixed. How? I don't know that. > My best suggestion would be for nodes behind firewalls to actively make themselves available to other nodes by establishing connections to them (so that those nodes can forward requests to the firewalled request. This fits in well enough with my ideas on what freenet's connection strategy should be, although it doesn't fit well at all with how the connection strategy is currently.
Thelema _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
