There was much stink raised over agressive bumping up of the last build 
that would be listened to by the network way back when to the point that 
the developers seem to be quite adverse to doing so anymore (eventhough 
you hear murmurings once in a while that we should do it coupled with an 
undertone of dread of being the person to suffer the wraith that that 
entails). I would like to offer an idea that might give both developers 
and users a happy middle ground.

Is it not possible to just set the "last good build" (whatever the 
variables are actually called is unknown to me) to (current_build - n)?

n is some "build-lag" that allows users some break from the upgrade 
treadmill yet is enough to prod them along so that developers get some 
feel on the network performance effect of their latest and greatest 
improvements. I would suggest a number like 10.

If the developers feel that the latest thing that they have done fixes 
some terribly hideous flaw in former builds then they can bump up the 
current_build number by more then 1 (but < 10) but should do so only for 
good reason. Otherwise there will be screams from the users to boost n 
and we are back to square one.

This policy can be advertised everywhere so that it is no surprise when 
someone's node falls off the edge of the network. It also absolves the 
developers of the resposibility of having to continuously update the 
webpage and make announcements everytime there is a significant change 
encouraging eveyone to update.

I think that this will be acceptable from both sides. I believe most 
users understand the need to keep up to date on a system in development 
but just don't want the rug pulled out from beneath their feet suddenly. 
On the flip side, I believe most developers understand that not all 
users want to do daily upgrades yet they also want to prod them along a 
little bit to get some real feedback on changes that they've made.

Mike


_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to