On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:58:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:54:54PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Looks just as messy as the current implementation IMO. Please take a > > > look at my proposal. I'd like to hear your opinions of it. I knocked it > > > up in Paint in a few minutes ^_^ > > > Doesn't work. Can't work. > > I see no reason why not - redundant or not, perhaps you can offer a > proper reason? If we just show the color-coded-bar, we give the user no clear indication of how close we are to completion, because the bar (being multicolored, as he shows, representing different completion status for different blocks) would have to show all blocks in the splitfile, which is more than just-the-number-of-blocks-we-want. I dunno, maybe we fill green (got it) from one end, red from the other (given up), and have a black border around the area representing the first two thirds (or whatever it is for this particular splitfile), so when the black-bordered-area gets filled up with green we've succeeded, or when the red gets to the black bordered area we've failed. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021219/f199b468/attachment.pgp>
