To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] naming of diagnostics fields References: <20020206155107.GJ3221 at niss.charter.net> From: Edgar Friendly <[email protected]> Date: 06 Feb 2002 17:11:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20020206155107.GJ3221 at niss.charter.net> Message-ID: <m2r8nyqk7c.fsf at thelema.dyndns.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Tavin Cole <tcole at espnow.com> writes: > There are a lot of diagnostics fields I'd like to add and I think things > are going to get out of control if we don't start alphabetizing them > when displayed. That means that prefixing the names with "inbound" or > "incoming" etc. is going to be a bad thing. So does anyone care if I > rename such fields by moving the "inbound" to the end of the name? > > -tc > feel free to massage the names for consistency, If that's what you want to spend time doing, it's not going to cause any headaches. Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com Raabu and Piisu GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
