On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 06:55:26PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 02:42:12AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > So, should we also provide separate CVS modules called "javax" and > > > > "junit" for the servlet API and unit-testing stuff? > > > > > > Currently I have checked in the freenet-ext.jar file into the lib/ > > > directory in the new "freenet" module. As for the suggestion above - I > > > really don't care, although it seems like overkill. > > > > Why are you checking in binary files? > > Sheer unbridled shameless convenience.
In what way is making everybody who wants to check out the freenet cvs module wait on a large binary download a convenience? It seems to me that you are completely abusing cvs to be some sort of preperation chamber for end user distributions, while ignoring the effects on the practicality of using it for what it is actually intended for - coders keeping up with each others concurrent versions. The module that coders need to check out to work inside should be light, contain only the internal source coded needed to build, and be adapted to maximum convenience toward hacking the code inside. The structure which you have passed down by royal decree is zero for three. <> -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
