On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 08:33:30AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 02:44:16AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:57:13PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > One java tree, one java tree, one java tree. > > > > > > So, should we also provide separate CVS modules called "javax" and > > > "junit" for the servlet API and unit-testing stuff? > > > > They are not under development - there is no reason not to just move the > > files into the tree. > > My point is, what happens if there is a standard practice of making the > CVS module correspond to the top-level package, as you are advocating, > and there is more than one development project sharing the same > top-level package name? > > Suppose you were developing free implementations of the servlet API > (javax.servlet) and JSSE (javax.net, javax.net.ssl, javax.security) > at the same time, for two different projects.
Symlinks happen, but it is nicer to avoid them. <> -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
