On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:42:52PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > The log-levels aren't really that useful (NORMAL and ERROR would > > probably suffice).. usually one wants to filter by Class. > > Well, that is already possible with the current system. No major change > there. > > I think the levels are good if somewhat mislabeled. Remaning > > ERROR -> CRITICAL > NORMAL -> IMPORTANT > MINOR -> RELEVANT > DEBUG -> TYPICAL > > so they clearly mark the importance of the statement would probably help > us use them correctly.
The differentiation b/t MINOR and DEBUG (or RELEVANT and TYPICAL) has always seemed pretty arbitrary to me. If you don't buy my two-level logging how about three? > > > Also, there are a lot of redundant log statements that should probably > > > go away completely as soon as things work half decently. > > > > I have been cutting down the DEBUG output and removed the stack-traces for > > connection/auth failures. > > I think what is important is that log statements never occur within > internal loops. Fred is no more than a collection of internal loops ;) -tc _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
