On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:56:08PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > 3) Probably most importantly, it undermines the real goals of this > project. Security and privacy for the publisher is just as great a part > of our goals as requester privacy, and encouraging freenet to be used > just as a proxy rather than an information storage network is going back > on that goal. I, for one, have not given up hope that we can make > freenet work at what it actually is.
Hear, hear! -- Taral <taral at taral.net> This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me. "Pretty please with dollars on top?" -- Me -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021110/326c88f7/attachment.pgp>
