Resending this 'cause I got no response. I think my mailserver gets hungry sometimes...
> >> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:05:54AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: > >> Matthew - What of the release builds do you think should be the minimum > to > >> run freenet? (from a technical/bugfixing/routing viewpoint) > >> > >> Which Package? 0.5.0.5...etc... > > >I don't know. At this point, there are important bugfixes on MAIN that > >have not yet been ported to stable. > > Currently STABLE-branch Last Good Build is set at 515 and UNSTABLE-branch is > set at 514.... > > Bumping to AT LEAST one of the offical releases would help greatly right > now, IMHO. > 0.5.0.6 came with build 533.............. > > >> How about raising the Last Good Build to the build found in that package. > >> Announce it to everyone a week ahead of time, post it on the website, in > >> announce, support, devl, etc. > > Tell Cofe so he can announce it on TFE and other freesite operators can do > the same. > > >Maybe. > >> > >> Let's finally clear up some of the OLD FUCKING KNOWN BUGS!!! Some of > which > >> can definately use up valuable HTL as nodes try to route around old buggy > >> nodes. > > >Like what? Believe it or not, some of us do actually care about old > >fucking known bugs. > > Sorry if I wasn't clear, I am talking about the ones you have already fixed! > :-) > > 70%-80% of nodes are running fairly recent builds anyway, and as long as you > give node operators a little time to upgrade first, (1-2 weeks) I am sure > they will be happy to do so. > > >> Then, we'll see how routing does or doesn't improve, and we can discuss > >> raising maxHTL from there... > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "fish" <fish at bovine.artificial-stupidity.net> > >> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> > >> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:02 AM > >> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of transient and ipaddress > settings > >> > >> > >> > > >> > On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> > > >> > > The network may not be usable enough for it to be any use though (I > do > >> > > think we should consider raising the maxHTL a bit (35 say?) because > of > >> > > the network growth - but given the likely large number of pre-0.5.1 > >> > > nodes out there, I'm not sure that we can...). I do agree with the > >> > > principle that we should make it easier to deploy freenet nodes. > >> > > >> > honestly, if it improved the retrival probability significantly, I > don't > >> > think anyone would object to a mandatory at this juncture. Or maybe > >> > people would, but you know, it'd make me happy :-p > >> > > > > - fish > _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
